Perhaps the most damning indictment of the current state of artificial intelligence comes from a simple, personal fact: many of the people who train the models now actively discourage their own families and friends from using them. This profound vote of no-confidence from the industry’s own workforce is a stark warning about the trustworthiness of the technology.
This advice doesn’t come from a place of ignorance. On the contrary, it comes from a place of deep, unparalleled expertise. These trainers have spent hundreds of hours interacting with the raw, unfiltered AI. They know its weaknesses, its biases, and its capacity for error better than anyone. Their skepticism is earned through experience.
They warn their loved ones because they have seen how the sausage is made. They know that the AI’s confident answers are often based on flimsy, rushed, and non-expert human verification. They know that the safety filters have loopholes and are being weakened over time. They are unwilling to let the people they care about be guinea pigs for a technology they know to be flawed.
This personal C-suite of “Chief Skepticism Officers” within the AI workforce should make us all pause. When the chefs won’t eat their own cooking, it’s a sign that something is deeply wrong in the kitchen. Their simple act of warning their families is a more powerful critique of the AI industry than any research paper or academic article.